NCAA 17/18. Villanova campeona
Foro de debate general sobre cualquier tema de basket
Lo de la comisión ha sido un poco de chiste. Cero autocrítica por parte de la NCAA y responsabilizando a agentes externos, fundamentalmente la NBA y las marcas deportivas. Incluso las medidas que pueden ser positivas a primera vista como permitir que los undrafted vuelvan a la universidad tienen poca aplicación práctica (sería un caos que los entrenadores tuvieran que esperar hasta junio para saber si la beca va para un nuevo recruit o tienen que dársela a alguien que a lo mejor no sale elegido).
The Independent Commission on College Basketball was established on October
11, 2017, to assess the state of the enterprise and to recommend transformational
changes to address multiple issues and challenges.
In brief, it is the overwhelming assessment of the Commission that the state of
men’s college basketball is deeply troubled. The levels of corruption and deception
are now at a point that they threaten the very survival of the college game as we know
it. It has taken some time to get here, and it will take time to change course. The
Commission offers its recommendations knowing that the road ahead is long – but
that the first steps must be taken – and they must be bold. The indictments handed
down by the Justice Department and the ongoing FBI investigation spurred the NCAA
to ask for this report. Whatever the outcome of the legal process, radical changes are
long overdue. We the commissioners believe that this is a final opportunity to turn the
course of college basketball in the right direction. Every stakeholder will have to accept
responsibility for what has happened in the past and commit to a new future if we are to
succeed.
The commissioners want to be very clear: There is much to admire about college
basketball even with its significant challenges. The commitment and hard work of
student-athletes is seen on basketball courts across the country. At tournament time,
underdogs rise up, defeat favorites, and become national darlings. The skill and
determination of these young student-athletes reminds all of us what it means to work
hard, prepare and perform under pressure. We experience deeply their triumphs and
their failures. College communities – including students, faculty, staff and alumni – are
bound together in pride and excitement as they support, cheer – live and die – with their
teams.
We know too that many young men who would otherwise have little chance of
attending college are able to take advantage of their talents to achieve something of great
value in our society and economy – a college degree. The scholarships themselves are
valuable, as students who finance their own education will attest; the in-kind benefits are
worth tens of thousands of dollars more. The lifetime financial benefit of a baccalaureate
degree can approach $1 million, and can change the recipient’s family for generations.
Of course, student-athletes must earn that degree to receive these benefits.
Lost in the talk of big money and corruption is colleges’ central mission to provide
higher education to students. There is debate about how to measure the graduation
rate for college students, including student-athletes. There is, however, general
agreement that the graduation rate for men’s Division I basketball players lags behind
that of other student-athletes, perhaps significantly. NCAA schools must take seriously
the obligation to help all student-athletes obtain the education they are promised.
The Commission believes that the answer to many of college basketball’s
problems lies in a renewed commitment to the college degree as the centerpiece of
intercollegiate athletics. Intercollegiate athletics is a trust based on a promise: athletes
play for their schools and receive a realistic chance to complete a college degree in
return. Any policy or action that violates that trust is morally wrong.
College basketball, like college sports generally, is to be played by studentathletes
who are members of the collegiate community, not paid professionals. Over
several decades, however, trends have emerged that call this understanding into
question. Millions of dollars are now generated by television contracts and apparel
sponsorship for the NCAA, universities and coaches. The financial stake in success has
grown exponentially; and thus, there is an arms race to recruit the best talent – and if
you are a coach – to keep your job. Future stars and their families know their value –
and can be tempted to monetize their worth as soon as possible since they will not be
compensated in college. Some agents, summer coaches and other third parties act as
intermediaries and facilitators. In other words, the environment surrounding college
basketball is a toxic mix of perverse incentives to cheat.
The NCAA’s investigative and enforcement functions were designed for a simpler
time, when rule violations did not put so much at stake. As a result, the NCAA, as an
enforcement entity, has little credibility with the public and its members, and what it has
continues to dwindle. There are multiple cases of compromised academic standards and
institutional integrity to keep the money and talent flowing. The NCAA and its member
institutions have been unable to adequately deter or punish bad behavior.
Given the undeniable impact of “big money” on the college game, it is fair to ask
whether the ideal of college basketball played by student-athletes who are part of the
academic community – not hired guns for a season or two – is still viable. The answer
is yes, and the effort is worth making. Transformative changes are necessary, but the
goal should not be to turn college basketball into another professional league. Rather,
we must change fundamentally the current culture and rules to address the effect that
money has had on college basketball, the NCAA and its member institutions.
To this end, the Commission makes a number of recommendations set forth
below. To ensure that we take advantage of the current momentum for change,
the Commission further calls on the NCAA to draw up its plan to implement the
Commission’s recommendations, including draft legislation, by early August 2018. The
Commission will promptly reconvene and review the NCAA’s plans to provide its input
for the NCAA’s concrete measures to renew college basketball.
11, 2017, to assess the state of the enterprise and to recommend transformational
changes to address multiple issues and challenges.
In brief, it is the overwhelming assessment of the Commission that the state of
men’s college basketball is deeply troubled. The levels of corruption and deception
are now at a point that they threaten the very survival of the college game as we know
it. It has taken some time to get here, and it will take time to change course. The
Commission offers its recommendations knowing that the road ahead is long – but
that the first steps must be taken – and they must be bold. The indictments handed
down by the Justice Department and the ongoing FBI investigation spurred the NCAA
to ask for this report. Whatever the outcome of the legal process, radical changes are
long overdue. We the commissioners believe that this is a final opportunity to turn the
course of college basketball in the right direction. Every stakeholder will have to accept
responsibility for what has happened in the past and commit to a new future if we are to
succeed.
The commissioners want to be very clear: There is much to admire about college
basketball even with its significant challenges. The commitment and hard work of
student-athletes is seen on basketball courts across the country. At tournament time,
underdogs rise up, defeat favorites, and become national darlings. The skill and
determination of these young student-athletes reminds all of us what it means to work
hard, prepare and perform under pressure. We experience deeply their triumphs and
their failures. College communities – including students, faculty, staff and alumni – are
bound together in pride and excitement as they support, cheer – live and die – with their
teams.
We know too that many young men who would otherwise have little chance of
attending college are able to take advantage of their talents to achieve something of great
value in our society and economy – a college degree. The scholarships themselves are
valuable, as students who finance their own education will attest; the in-kind benefits are
worth tens of thousands of dollars more. The lifetime financial benefit of a baccalaureate
degree can approach $1 million, and can change the recipient’s family for generations.
Of course, student-athletes must earn that degree to receive these benefits.
Lost in the talk of big money and corruption is colleges’ central mission to provide
higher education to students. There is debate about how to measure the graduation
rate for college students, including student-athletes. There is, however, general
agreement that the graduation rate for men’s Division I basketball players lags behind
that of other student-athletes, perhaps significantly. NCAA schools must take seriously
the obligation to help all student-athletes obtain the education they are promised.
The Commission believes that the answer to many of college basketball’s
problems lies in a renewed commitment to the college degree as the centerpiece of
intercollegiate athletics. Intercollegiate athletics is a trust based on a promise: athletes
play for their schools and receive a realistic chance to complete a college degree in
return. Any policy or action that violates that trust is morally wrong.
College basketball, like college sports generally, is to be played by studentathletes
who are members of the collegiate community, not paid professionals. Over
several decades, however, trends have emerged that call this understanding into
question. Millions of dollars are now generated by television contracts and apparel
sponsorship for the NCAA, universities and coaches. The financial stake in success has
grown exponentially; and thus, there is an arms race to recruit the best talent – and if
you are a coach – to keep your job. Future stars and their families know their value –
and can be tempted to monetize their worth as soon as possible since they will not be
compensated in college. Some agents, summer coaches and other third parties act as
intermediaries and facilitators. In other words, the environment surrounding college
basketball is a toxic mix of perverse incentives to cheat.
The NCAA’s investigative and enforcement functions were designed for a simpler
time, when rule violations did not put so much at stake. As a result, the NCAA, as an
enforcement entity, has little credibility with the public and its members, and what it has
continues to dwindle. There are multiple cases of compromised academic standards and
institutional integrity to keep the money and talent flowing. The NCAA and its member
institutions have been unable to adequately deter or punish bad behavior.
Given the undeniable impact of “big money” on the college game, it is fair to ask
whether the ideal of college basketball played by student-athletes who are part of the
academic community – not hired guns for a season or two – is still viable. The answer
is yes, and the effort is worth making. Transformative changes are necessary, but the
goal should not be to turn college basketball into another professional league. Rather,
we must change fundamentally the current culture and rules to address the effect that
money has had on college basketball, the NCAA and its member institutions.
To this end, the Commission makes a number of recommendations set forth
below. To ensure that we take advantage of the current momentum for change,
the Commission further calls on the NCAA to draw up its plan to implement the
Commission’s recommendations, including draft legislation, by early August 2018. The
Commission will promptly reconvene and review the NCAA’s plans to provide its input
for the NCAA’s concrete measures to renew college basketball.
-
Bias
- Mensajes: 12671
- Registrado: 31 Jul 2008, 12:58
- Ubicación: "Si supiera que el mundo se acaba mañana, yo, hoy todavía, plantaría un árbol" M.L.K
Viene de promediar 17 puntos por partido, le quedan dos años de elegibilidad. Tenía ofertas de buenas universidades. Le deben de gustar los búhos porque es la mascota de la universidad en la que estaba también 
"Allen Iverson is a genius. Yes, he didn’t get his ring, but he was able to outplay the entire opponent’s team.I think he is the most skilled NBA player of all time" Alexey Shved
"If you love basketball, you love Temple" Tom Crean
"If you love basketball, you love Temple" Tom Crean
Florida State center Ike Obiagu says he is leaving the team and plans to transfer.
The 7-foot freshman from Nigeria made the announcement Sunday on his Twitter account. Obiagu started 14 games last season and led the team in blocked shots with 71, including 25 over the final eight games. He averaged 2.3 points and 2.6 rebounds.
Florida State has lost two players due to transfers. Point guard C.J. Walker left the program last month and transferred to Ohio State. Obiagu didn't say where he was going.
The Seminoles finished 23-12 last season and reached the Elite Eight for the first time since 1993, losing to Michigan in the West Region final.
Duke is surprisingly adding another five-star prospect to its top-ranked 2018 recruiting class.
Five-star forward Joey Baker announced Wednesday he is reclassifying to 2018 and will enroll at Duke in the fall. Baker committed to the Blue Devils in October as a member of the 2019 class, but he will graduate high school a year early and enter college sooner than expected.
"The coaching staff and I felt it was the best option for this upcoming year," Baker told ESPN. "I'll be challenged to grow on and off the court."
Baker, ranked No. 15 in the ESPN 60 for 2019, is a 6-foot-7 forward from Trinity Christian School in North Carolina. Playing for Team Felton on the Under Armour Association circuit, Baker averaged 10.9 points and 4.3 rebounds while shooting 40 percent from 3-point range over the past two weekends.
Baker is now the fifth five-star prospect in Duke's 2018 class, joining the top three prospects in the country -- R.J. Barrett, Zion Williamson and Cam Reddish -- and five-star point guard Tre Jones.
Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski is losing all five starters from last season, with Grayson Allen graduating and Marvin Bagley III, Wendell Carter Jr., Gary Trent Jr. and Trevon Duval all leaving early for the NBA draft.
No entiendo muy bien la motivacion de Baker mas alla de acelerar su carrera, porque lo que es jugar, no va a jugar nada de nada.
Jones-Goldwire
Barrett-O'Connell
Reddish-Baker
Williamson-White
Bolden-DeLaurier-Vrankovic
Van a jugar los titulares+O'Connell y DeLaurier basicamente, igual algo de Goldwire.
Jones-Goldwire
Barrett-O'Connell
Reddish-Baker
Williamson-White
Bolden-DeLaurier-Vrankovic
Van a jugar los titulares+O'Connell y DeLaurier basicamente, igual algo de Goldwire.
Por cierto, desconocía por completo que Cole Anthony, uno de los prospects estrella del 2019, es hijo de Greg Anthony.ESPN 60 junior Justin Moore out of DeMatha Catholic High School in Maryland became the second player to give Villanova an early verbal commitment in the Class of 2019, following an unofficial visit to campus on Tuesday. Here's a look at what he'll bring to Philadelphia.
Cada vez más jugadores hay en la liga hijos de jugadores con cierto nombre de la década de los 90 y principios de los 2000. Stephen Curry y Seth Curry, Glenn Robinson III, Jae Crowder, Jerian Grant y Jerami Grant, Tim Hardaway Jr, Austin Rivers, David Stockton... así que recuerde. Y algunos más habrá.Cassell escribió:Por cierto, desconocía por completo que Cole Anthony, uno de los prospects estrella del 2019, es hijo de Greg Anthony.ESPN 60 junior Justin Moore out of DeMatha Catholic High School in Maryland became the second player to give Villanova an early verbal commitment in the Class of 2019, following an unofficial visit to campus on Tuesday. Here's a look at what he'll bring to Philadelphia.
Este año mismo entran en la universidad el hijo de Shaq en UCLA (recruit de 4 estrellas) y el de Manute Bol en Oregon (5 estrellas). El propio RJ Barrett es también hijo de jugador profesional.Ellroy escribió:Cada vez más jugadores hay en la liga hijos de jugadores con cierto nombre de la década de los 90 y principios de los 2000. Stephen Curry y Seth Curry, Glenn Robinson III, Jae Crowder, Jerian Grant y Jerami Grant, Tim Hardaway Jr, Austin Rivers, David Stockton... así que recuerde. Y algunos más habrá.Cassell escribió:Por cierto, desconocía por completo que Cole Anthony, uno de los prospects estrella del 2019, es hijo de Greg Anthony.ESPN 60 junior Justin Moore out of DeMatha Catholic High School in Maryland became the second player to give Villanova an early verbal commitment in the Class of 2019, following an unofficial visit to campus on Tuesday. Here's a look at what he'll bring to Philadelphia.
Y el primer recruit de Penny Hardaway en Memphis fue precisamente su hijo. Siempre ha habido casos, pero el tema es que ahora lo que pasa es que hemos visto jugar a sus padres (se podría añadir a Klay Thompson, Andrew Wiggins, Larry Nance Jr., Sabonis y muchos cuantos casos más), algunos incluso de retirada más o menos reciente.dree_15 escribió:Este año mismo entran en la universidad el hijo de Shaq en UCLA (recruit de 4 estrellas) y el de Manute Bol en Oregon (5 estrellas). El propio RJ Barrett es también hijo de jugador profesional.Ellroy escribió:Cada vez más jugadores hay en la liga hijos de jugadores con cierto nombre de la década de los 90 y principios de los 2000. Stephen Curry y Seth Curry, Glenn Robinson III, Jae Crowder, Jerian Grant y Jerami Grant, Tim Hardaway Jr, Austin Rivers, David Stockton... así que recuerde. Y algunos más habrá.Cassell escribió:
Por cierto, desconocía por completo que Cole Anthony, uno de los prospects estrella del 2019, es hijo de Greg Anthony.
Y alguno de esos hijos de buen o gran jugador por venir que vaya para estrella?
Tiempo de sueños.
De RJ Barrett se dice que es uno de los máximos favoritos para ser el número uno del draft del 2019, por ejemplo.
-
dallas1993
- Mensajes: 2676
- Registrado: 11 Ago 2010, 22:41
- Ubicación: Donostia-San Sebastian
Qué ha dicho pues?Cassell escribió:La madre de Wendell Carter Jr. se ha quedado muy a gusto.
Enviado desde mi Redmi Note 4 mediante Tapatalk
Busco la camiseta del City home del año 10-11 talla S
También Vendo esta camiseta a precio de coste o cambio:
-Chelsea away techfit Original talla L
También Vendo esta camiseta a precio de coste o cambio:
-Chelsea away techfit Original talla L
-
arijan komazec
- Mensajes: 18153
- Registrado: 25 Feb 2002, 21:35
- Ubicación: Gijón
Que los blancos enriqueciéndose del trabajo de los negros, sin que estos cobren ni tengan derechos, es lo que comparten la NCAA y la exclavitud.dallas1993 escribió:Qué ha dicho pues?Cassell escribió:La madre de Wendell Carter Jr. se ha quedado muy a gusto.
Enviado desde mi Redmi Note 4 mediante Tapatalk
O algo así.
[img]http://a.espncdn.com/i/pkg/05NBAdraft/250/18764.jpg[/img]
¿Quién está conectado?
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: bckhm520 y 3 invitados
Fecha actual 19 Abr 2024, 16:19