The Lakers had conversations about joining the Jazz and Knicks a few weeks ago in a potential three-team trade, league sources told HoopsHype. The proposed three-team trade scenario included Russell Westbrook going to Utah and getting bought out. Utah would send Donovan Mitchell to the Knicks, a combination of two players, including Patrick Beverley and Jordan Clarkson, Bojan Bogdanovic or Malik Beasley to the Lakers, and the Jazz would receive significant draft pick compensation from the Knicks and Lakers. The Knicks also would’ve had to part with veteran salary filler(s), such as Derrick Rose to help make the salaries work.
En Spurs parecía tener la cabeza mejor atornillada la verdadPinHeadKnickJR escribió:Gracias Leon Rose por no soltar 4 primeras rondas por el payaso de Dejounte Murray. Cringe heavy con este chaval.
Pues hubiera sido nuestro payaso, que aquí hemos tenido trash talkers y zumbados de la cabeza para dar y tomar y los hemos adorado.PinHeadKnickJR escribió:Gracias Leon Rose por no soltar 4 primeras rondas por el payaso de Dejounte Murray. Cringe heavy con este chaval.
Over the past few weeks, I’ve written or said or thought some variation of the following line countless times: the Knicks’ B-level offer is better than most of the other suitors’ A-level offers. But how true is that? Which of the Non-Knicks Six can come close to the package New York could cobble together? The Jazz want five or six or seven first-round picks, as well as young players. The Knicks own all of their firsts as well as four from other teams: the Wizards’ in 2023, the Detroit Pistons’ in ‘23, the Dallas Mavericks’ in ‘23 and the Milwaukee Bucks’ in ‘25. All of those are protected. They can deal up to eight first-rounders, including up to four unprotected ones. They could add at least three first-round swaps. They have attractive up-and-comers, including RJ Barrett (who we should assume would not be part of a hypothetical deal), Quentin Grimes, Immanuel Quickley and Obi Toppin.
Offering, say, five first-rounders, some of them protected, along with one young player wouldn’t come close to meeting the Jazz’s asking price. But at the same time, some teams in the running couldn’t even beat that. And thus, we have a stalemate. For now, the Knicks know no one is coming close to them. And the Jazz want more for Mitchell than they received in that gargantuan return for Rudy Gobert
El problema no es lo que tengas, es lo que quieres dar, y los Knicks no quieren dar demasiadas rondas.jamesharden13 escribió:Over the past few weeks, I’ve written or said or thought some variation of the following line countless times: the Knicks’ B-level offer is better than most of the other suitors’ A-level offers. But how true is that? Which of the Non-Knicks Six can come close to the package New York could cobble together? The Jazz want five or six or seven first-round picks, as well as young players. The Knicks own all of their firsts as well as four from other teams: the Wizards’ in 2023, the Detroit Pistons’ in ‘23, the Dallas Mavericks’ in ‘23 and the Milwaukee Bucks’ in ‘25. All of those are protected. They can deal up to eight first-rounders, including up to four unprotected ones. They could add at least three first-round swaps. They have attractive up-and-comers, including RJ Barrett (who we should assume would not be part of a hypothetical deal), Quentin Grimes, Immanuel Quickley and Obi Toppin.Offering, say, five first-rounders, some of them protected, along with one young player wouldn’t come close to meeting the Jazz’s asking price. But at the same time, some teams in the running couldn’t even beat that. And thus, we have a stalemate. For now, the Knicks know no one is coming close to them. And the Jazz want more for Mitchell than they received in that gargantuan return for Rudy Gobert
Muy interesanteThe J0ker escribió:Aqui hacen un ranking de todos los picks de primera ronda traspasados hasta el momento, para entender el valor que tienen en la Liga los picks protegidos que poseen los Knicks:
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/whic ... ged-hands/
En eso cuenta con mi espadaSpree85 escribió:Se agrace un apoyo a los que no queremos dar 7 primeras, se vienen tiempos duros porque por suerte parece que no las van a dar.
¿Es un ranking? Porque si lo es, tres de nuestras cuatro rondas están entre las diez peores del ranking, en el puesto 42º (Dallas) 38º (Wizards) 37º (Thunder) y luego la de los Bucks en el 26º.The J0ker escribió:Aqui hacen un ranking de todos los picks de primera ronda traspasados hasta el momento, para entender el valor que tienen en la Liga los picks protegidos que poseen los Knicks:
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/whic ... ged-hands/
Los Hornets, que supuestamente están en la puja, han jugado menos veces que los Knicks play-offs en los últimos 20 años, ninguna consecutiva, tienen peor balance que nosotros en ese intervalo de tiempo y han tenido mejores posiciones en las elecciones; por ese razonamiento, sus elecciones no protegidas, son mejores que las nuestras, por lo que si ofrecen más que nosotros, son más interesantes para Utah que las nuestras.Spree85 escribió:As a general rule, I am in favor of trading for unprotected Knicks picks. Yes, Mitchell's presence will hurt those picks, but this is a franchise that has made the playoffs in consecutive seasons only once, during a three-year run, over the past 20 years. History suggests some of those picks are going to be in the lottery. For Utah, getting a few unprotected Knicks picks in a Mitchell deal matters far more than maximizing the total number of picks as many of them will likely be protected.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 3 invitados